New Jersey Senate Bill S472 would cut the uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage that Uber and Lyft must carry during a ride from $1.5 million to as low as $35,000, the same minimum a private driver carries. Uber and Lyft support it and say New Jersey’s requirement is the highest in the country. Injury lawyers and crash victims oppose it, because UM/UIM is what pays a passenger hit by an uninsured or minimum-coverage driver. Status as of our last check (April 2026): referred to the Senate Commerce Committee. Not law. This page is updated as the bill moves. Questions about a current claim: (732) 625-9494.
S472 at a glance
- What it changes: the UM/UIM minimum for rideshare trips in N.J.S.A. 39:5H-10(c), from $1.5 million down toward the state’s personal auto minimum ($35,000 per person as of 2026).
- What it does not change: the $1.5 million liability coverage for injuries the rideshare driver causes.
- Who it affects: passengers and rideshare drivers hit by an uninsured, hit-and-run or minimum-coverage driver during a trip.
- Session: 2026-2027 New Jersey Legislature. Referred to the Senate Commerce Committee.
- Current law still applies. A crash today is covered at $1.5 million UM/UIM.

Status log
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026 session | S472 introduced in the New Jersey Senate and referred to the Senate Commerce Committee. |
| April 2026 | CBS News New York reports on the bill. Uber and Lyft state support. The family of a passenger seriously injured in a 2024 West Caldwell crash with an uninsured driver speaks against it. |
| Last checked | No committee vote reported. The bill is not law. We will update this table when the status changes. |
What the bill would do
Today, N.J.S.A. 39:5H-10(c) requires two kinds of coverage during a prearranged ride: $1.5 million in liability coverage, which pays people the rideshare driver injures, and $1.5 million in uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, which pays the rideshare driver and passengers when someone else causes the crash and has no insurance or not enough. S472 targets the second number. It would reduce the UM/UIM requirement to a level that can be as low as the personal auto minimum, now $35,000 per person and $70,000 per crash under P.L.2022, c.87.
The liability coverage is not touched. If the rideshare driver causes your injuries, $1.5 million remains available under the bill as written. The cut applies when the other driver is at fault and underinsured, which, in New Jersey, is often.
Who would be hurt
Consider a passenger in an Uber on the Turnpike, hit by a driver with no insurance who then flees. Under current law, the passenger’s claim runs against the rideshare policy’s $1.5 million UM coverage. Under S472, it would run against $35,000. For a passenger with a spinal injury and a six-figure hospital bill, that is the difference between a recovery and a bankruptcy.
Rideshare drivers are affected the same way. Most injured rideshare drivers were hit by someone else, and the UM/UIM tier is their main protection. See our drivers page. People who do not own cars, and therefore have no UM/UIM of their own, have the most to lose. The 2024 West Caldwell case cited in press coverage involved exactly this situation: a seriously injured passenger, an uninsured at-fault driver, and a family now in litigation over who pays the medical bills.
The case for the bill
Uber and Lyft argue that New Jersey’s requirement is the highest in the nation, that insurance is a large share of every fare, and that lowering the UM/UIM minimum would reduce rider prices. Uber has said that roughly 31 percent of each fare goes to insurers. An industry-commissioned economic report published in late 2025 made a similar argument about the cost of 39:5H-10. Most states require $1 million in liability coverage during a ride and far less, or nothing specific, in UM/UIM. Supporters frame S472 as bringing New Jersey in line with other states.
The case against it
Opponents point out that the UM/UIM requirement exists because New Jersey has many drivers carrying only the minimum, and some carrying nothing. A rider has no way to check the insurance of the stranger who runs the light. The TNC Act placed that risk on the rideshare companies, which are in a position to price it, rather than on the rider, who is not. Cutting the coverage shifts the cost of uninsured drivers from a fare surcharge onto the injured person, and then onto hospitals and public programs when the injured person cannot pay. Opponents also note that the companies’ own liability coverage, which pays for their drivers’ mistakes, is left at $1.5 million, which suggests the companies can carry that level when it protects them from claims.
What this means for your claim right now
Nothing has changed. A crash that happens while S472 is pending is covered under current law. If the bill passes, the question of which version applies to a given crash will depend on its effective date and the policy in force on the date of the crash. Insurers do not get to apply a future law to a past crash. If you were injured as a passenger or driver by an uninsured or underinsured motorist, the $1.5 million tier is what your claim runs against today.
How to follow or weigh in
Bill text, sponsors and committee actions are on the New Jersey Legislature’s website under S472. Committee hearings are open to the public and accept written testimony. New Jersey residents can contact their state senator through the same site. The Grossman Law Firm will update this page when the bill moves, and we are glad to speak with reporters covering it.
Scott D. Grossman has practiced New Jersey personal injury law since 1997, with 12 offices across the state. Free case review: (732) 625-9494.
Sources: NJ Senate Bill S472 (2026-2027 session), New Jersey Legislature · CBS News New York, “Proposed N.J. bill would reduce insurance requirements for ride-share drivers” (April 4, 2026) · N.J.S.A. 39:5H-10 · P.L.2022, c.87.
Free Case Review
S472 Questions
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uber Technologies, Inc. or Lyft, Inc. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

